We see youre using a mobile device.
Would you like to try our mobile site: m.gsa.gov?
Historic Preservation - Technical Procedures |
Spectitle: | Reducing Lead-Based Paint Hazards Using Abatement Techniques On Windows |
Procedure code: | 0990002R |
Source: | 1994 Crm, Vol. 17, No. 4/1997 Windows Conference Paper |
Division: | Finishes |
Section: | Painting |
Last Modified: | 02/24/2012 |
Details: | Reducing Lead-Based Paint Hazards Using Abatement Techniques On Windows REDUCING LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS USING ABATEMENT TECHNIQUES ON WINDOWS THE 1995 HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) GUIDELINES REGARDING THE EVALUATION AND CONTROL OF LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS WERE DEVELOPED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE IN LEAD ABATEMENT/REDUCTION WORK REQUIRED FOR FEDERALLY ASSISTED HOUSING PROJECTS. THOUGH THESE GUIDELINES ARE NOT ENFORCED ON PRIVATE HOUSING PROJECTS OR PROJECTS INVOLVING OTHER BUILDING TYPES, THEY ARE A WELL-RECOGNIZED REFERENCE FOR MAKING BUILDINGS LEAD-SAFE, AND THEIR USE AS A RESOURCE IS RECOMMENDED IN ANY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REQUIRING LEAD- REDUCTION WORK. FOR THIS REASON, THESE GUIDELINES ARE FREQUENTLY REFERENCED IN THIS AND OTHER RELATED PROCEDURES. This procedure describes two methods of removing lead-based paint from windows using abatement techniques. These include window replacement and paint removal. Abatement is classified by HUD as any treatment for eliminating lead-based paint that is considered permanent, or rather, capable of lasting twenty years. This may include any of the following: Complete removal of the lead-based paint; removal and replacement of the lead-based paint component; enclosure of the component or surface; or application of an encapsulant coating. - For historic buildings, "Hazard Abatement" is recommended and involves eliminating the hazard rather than the entire feature or all of the lead-based paint. This type of action is more economical and serves to protect more of the original building fabric from being damaged or destroyed. Hazard abatement may be achieved by means of removing paint from SELECTED surfaces, removing SELECTED features, encapsulating DETERIORATED painted surfaces, removing and replacing CONTAMINATED soil, and disposal of all hazardous waste according to federal, state and local safety regulations. - For guidance in evaluating mitigation strategies for lead- based paint hazard reduction, see 09900-03-S. For general protection measures in lead-based paint hazard reduction work, see 09900-10-S. For guidance in reducing lead-based paint hazards using interim control techniques or a combination of abatement and interim control techniques on windows, see 09900-03-R and 09900-04-R respectively. Window Replacement: Removal and replacement of the entire window unit is a common activity justified by the desire to completely eliminate lead- based paint hazards and to improve energy efficiency. This practice is not preferred in historic preservation projects, as it is not only costly, but it can result in the loss of significant features that are otherwise in good condition. Paint Removal Techniques: Complete paint removal from SELECTED surfaces, which have been determined to pose a threat as a source of contamination, is considered a "hazard abatement" as described above. Various methods of paint removal may be used, but note the cautions listed below for each. Removal of loose paint only using wet sanding and scraping is considered an interim control technique, not abatement. Off-site stripping in a controlled environment is preferred. On-site stripping requires a high degree of worker knowledge and training in lead paint abatement safety. Heat Guns: USE CAUTION! At operating temperatures above 1,100 degrees F., lead fumes may be produced. Heat guns may be safely used at lower temperatures, but the required scraping that must accompany this produces airborne lead dust that can be a hazard to the worker if proper respiratory protection is not provided. Mechanical Tools: Recommended only with HEPA vacuum attachments. AVOID MECHANICAL OR ABRASIVE PAINT REMOVAL TECHNIQUES AS WELL AS DRY SCRAPING, AS THESE METHODS GENERATE EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS OF LEAD DUST. Chemical Strippers: Caustic and non-caustic strippers are acceptable. This method usually generates the least amount of airborne dust. Caustic strippers must be carefully neutralized. METHYLENE CHLORIDE PAINT STRIPPERS ARE DISCOURAGED AS THIS CHEMICAL IS BANNED IN SOME STATES SUCH AS CALIFORNIA. REGULATORY INFORMATION AS WELL AS ALTERNATIVE OR EQUIVALENT CHEMICALS MAY BE REQUESTED FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) REGIONAL OFFICE AND/OR THE STATE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. For additional guidance in paint removal using chemicals, see 04211-14-R, 05010-17-R and 06400-07-R. END OF SECTION |