Linear LED Lighting Retrofits

GPG-030, SEPTEMBER 2016

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) evaluated two linear LED lighting retrofits that use the existing lens and fixture. Results showed energy savings between 27-29%, and general occupant satisfaction with light level and quality. Click on the infographic below to enlarge.[PDF - 246 KB]

 

GPG Findings 030, September 2016, LED Fixtures with Integrated Advanced Lighting Controls. Opportunity:How much energycould GSA save by converting LFLs to LEDs? 134 GWH ELECTRICITY/YEAR. REPLACING 1.53 MILLION LINEARFLORESCENT LAMPS (LFLS) $15 MILLION ANNUAL SAVINGS at national average utility rate of $0.11/kWh. Technology: How do these LED Retrofits work? REPLACE LAMP AND LED DRIVER USING EXISTING LENS & FIXTURE; NO NEED TO ALTER CEILING GRID. Compatible with advanced lighting controls (ALCs). Measurement and Verification. Where did M and V occur? PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY assessed two LED retrofits (“LED-A” and “LED-B”) in three federal buildings: GSA ’s regionalheadquarters in Auburn, Washington; the Cabell Federal Building in Dallas, Texas; and the Veterans Administration Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Results: How did LED downlight lamps perform in M&V?27-29%ENERGY SAVINGS. ADDITIONAL SAVINGS POSSIBLE WITH ALC.EASY INSTALLATION SIMILAR TO LFL LAMP AND BALLAST REPLACEMENT.Deployment: Where does M&V recommend deploying LED downlight lamps? 6YR PAYBACK AT AVG. UTILITY RATE AND $50 FIXTURE COST.LED options had similar illuminance levels (4500 lumens, LED-A; 4400, LED-B)but different light output.Where does M&V recommend deploying LED Retrofits? FIXTURES WITH LENSES ANDSOCKETS IN GOOD CONDITION. And where ALC is desired or useful. To asses fit, light levels, color, temperatureand glare, test a small number of lights before committing to purchase. Consider compatibility and controls when selecting an LED replacement.LED-A Replacement lamp, uses alternative mounting, LED driver.LED-B Replacement lamp, uses existing socket, LED driver.


Reference above to any specific commercial product, process or service does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favoring by the U.S. government or any agency thereof.
 

 

Last Reviewed 2016-09-27